Relation to other areas from Lexical Semantics

    Relation to other areas from Lexical Semantics

Yet not, that it mapping between hierarchies is not always sufficient to expect the syntactic realization out-of an argument. And in case here is the case, the latest mapping try restricted because of more information on this new syntactic summation out-of objections; which behavior try then followed, in the event to some other the total amount, from inside the GB and you will LFG frameworks. For the GB, in the event that syntactic term away from an arguments can not be predict with the the basis away from standard laws, like in the way it is from emotional verbs, this post is given in the number of lexical representations for the the form of Instance-grid [Bel88]. By contrast, LFG lexical representations systematically through the “syntactic form assignment”, we.e. the new explicit stipulation of your own syntactic bottom line out of verb’s objections; centered on latest advancements [Bre89], so it requirements is created inside underspecified means. Due to its peculiar conception from grammatical connections, FG never ever consists of demands of this kind: as the subject and you will target solutions is done on the basis of practical factors, this new mapping ranging from semantic and you may syntactic properties merely describes the number regarding you are able to syntactic realizations, thus saying tastes rather than limitations inside listing of it is possible to mappings.

A form of regular mapping ranging from grammatical relationships and you can semantic roles is also thought in the Dowty’s conception regarding proto-roles and extra advancements. Actually, proto-positions was linked to dispute choices from thus-called “Disagreement Solutions Principle”, predicated on that the disagreement whereby the newest predicate entails the latest best number of Proto-Agent attributes could be lexicalized due to the fact subject of the predicate and the dispute obtaining greatest level of Proto-Diligent characteristics have a tendency to, all else are equivalent, getting lexicalized while the lead target. The essential tip root this method so you can disagreement selection is the fact the new ranks according to that arguments away from good verb contend with each other regarding subjecthood and you may objecthood is offered from the clustering from semantic features, unlike of the mapping between certain positions (say between Agent and you will Subject). That is to state that conflict selection of topic and you may target depends on the full number of Proto-Agent entailments and you can Proto-Diligent entailments found because of the per conflict of a good verb.

To sum up, about three different facets have been pulled while the determining attributes of the new form of mapping between lexical and you may syntactic representations, i.age. whether:

  • lexical representations is mapped possibly to D-structure otherwise personally on the skin structure of the phrase;
  • the new mapping is actually restricted from the a steps from semantic positions;
  • the new mapping criteria express limits or preferences on the syntactic term out-of arguments.

    Researching Tactics

Regarding the formalization, about three treatments is going to be recognized. Earliest, methods which trust an informal specification like Jackendoff’s lexical conceptual formations [Jac90]. Next, ways like those suggested because of the [Dow79], [Dow89] which can be put up within a product-theoretical structure. 3rd ways which give an algebraic requirements in this a typed function construction formalism; this type of tend to be more dependent for the NLP programs (age.g. [San92b], [San93a], [San93b], [SanFCa]).

    Security inside the Lexical Databases

Thematic roles also are included in new EUROTRA MT lexica (§ step 3.9.1), DELIS (§3.10.5), new EDR Design Description Dictionary (§step 3.6).

The work off [Dow91] could have been taken since starting point of the EAGLES advice to your encryption out of thematic opportunities [EAG96]).

Regardless of such different conceptions of your own mapping between semantic and you will syntactic relationships, all the buildings noticed here express the entire assumption that relationships ranging from semantic and you will syntactic relations is actually restricted of the a world steps out of semantic positions. This idea extends back to [Fil68] whom very first designed the view you to topic selection is within certain way sensitive to a hierarchy regarding “cases”, we.age. semantic interactions. After the Fillmore, very theories invoke (though to some other the amount) a beneficial mapping ranging from a bought directory of semantic (we.e. a ladder) and you may a purchased list of grammatical relations (sometimes shown since some other ranking in this words indicators, or clearly or implicitly planned inside hierarchical conditions). Given an excellent thematic/semantic ladder (broker > motif . ) and you can a great syntactic steps (topic > object . ), all round types of new mapping can be as uses: map the latest semantic roles from certain disagreement build, that have been ordered according to the ladder, for the syntactic hierarchy away from leftover so you’re able to right. Under this examine, brand new mapping is subject to hierarchical, we.age. cousin, actions (which is, “higher” semantic positions try mapped to “higher” syntactic interactions), unlike invariable telecommunications relations (such as a given semantic part usually maps on to a given grammatical relatives).

Leave a Reply